Policy Analysis
Authors
Nora Sulots
News Type
News
Date
Paragraphs

The Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law (CDDRL) is thrilled to share the news that Francis Fukuyama, Olivier Nomellini Senior Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies (FSI) and Director of Stanford’s Ford Dorsey Masters in International Policy Program, has been selected as the recipient of the 2024 Fred Riggs Award for Lifetime Achievement in International and Comparative Public Administration.

Widely considered one of the most prestigious awards in the field of public administration, the Fred Riggs Award was established by SICA, the Section on International and Comparative Administration of the American Society for Public Administration (ASPA), in 1985 to recognize those who have made significant, substantial, and widely recognized contributions to the conceptual, theoretical, or operational development of international, comparative, or development administration. In their announcement of the award, SICA noted that “Dr. Fukuyama and Dr. Fred Riggs share a curiosity about diverse societies, interdisciplinarity, and a broad conception of our field” and that Fukuyama’s long-standing dedication to academic research in comparative public administration earned him this distinguished recognition.

Dr. Fukuyama has written widely on issues in development and international politics. His 1992 book, The End of History and the Last Man, has appeared in over twenty foreign editions. His most recent book, Liberalism and Its Discontents, was published in May 2022.

Dr. Fukuyama's selection for the award underscores his profound impact on the field of public administration. In his nomination letter, Dr. Alasdair Roberts, professor of public policy at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, shared that his “sophisticated discussion of concepts and problems in the field has been combined with concern for careful empirical investigation.”

SICA Chair Aroon P. Manoharan added, “It is impressive to note that [Fukuyama’s] works have been widely cited and significantly impacted the field. [His] 2004 book State-Building has been cited more than 4,400 times (Google Scholar), and [his] 2013 article "What is governance?" in Governance in 2013 has been cited more than a thousand times. Dr. Roberts also notes that [Fukuyama is] "one of those rare scholars capable of engaging and informing public policy without any loss of scholarly rigor and depth." [His] essays "America in Decay" (Foreign Affairs) and "In Defense of the Deep State" (Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Administration) have been enormously influential to the broader community on the crucial issues in administration and governance.”

“I’m really proud to receive this award,” Fukuyama said. “My own field of political science does not take public administration with anything like the seriousness it deserves. Public administration plays a vital role in the shaping of societies worldwide.”

I’m really proud to receive this award. My own field of political science does not take public administration with anything like the seriousness it deserves. Public administration plays a vital role in the shaping of societies worldwide.
Francis Fukuyama
Olivier Nomellini Senior Fellow, FSI

In addition to his scholarly endeavors, Dr. Fukuyama has been actively involved in various institutions and associations dedicated to public service and administration. He served in the US Department of State on two occasions and is currently on the board of the Volcker Alliance, an organization founded by Paul Volcker dedicated to promoting public service. His notable engagements, including the Donald C. Stone Lecture at the 2023 ASPA Annual Conference, have resonated deeply with the public administration community.

Please join us in offering our heartfelt congratulations to Dr. Fukuyama on his well-deserved honor. It is a testament to his hard work, dedication, and enormous international contributions to public administration and policy. He will receive the award on April 12, 2024, at ASPA’s annual conference in Minneapolis, MN.

Read More

Construction on a building in Sri Lanka
Q&As

Stanford Researchers Explore the Challenges Created By and Reforms Needed to Improve China’s Belt and Road Initiative

Francis Fukuyama and Michael Bennon share their insights on the potential implications of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) on global development finance, as well as suggestions for reforms that could bolster international stakeholders’ ability to manage any potential debt crises arising from BRI projects.
Stanford Researchers Explore the Challenges Created By and Reforms Needed to Improve China’s Belt and Road Initiative
Solving Public Policy Problems
News

Reimagining Public Policy Education at Stanford and Beyond

The Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law is proud to announce the launch of a new free massive open online course aimed at providing participants with a foundational knowledge of the best means for enacting effective policy change in their home countries.
Reimagining Public Policy Education at Stanford and Beyond
All News button
1
Subtitle

The Fred Riggs Award for Lifetime Achievement in Public Administration is an academic award given annually by the Section on International and Comparative Administration of the American Society for Public Administration.

Authors
News Type
News
Date
Paragraphs

Spring is just around the corner at the Farm, which means it's time for the students in the 2024 cohort of the Ford Dorsey Master's in International Policy program (MIP) to put down the books, roll up their sleeves, and get to work on their capstone projects.

Each year, second-year MIP students participate in the Policy Change Studio, an innovative two-quarter course that is designed to provide students with the know-how to bring about change in the world through hands-on projects. After a year and a half of studying the principles and frameworks of effective policymaking, our students take those ideas out of the classroom and put them into practice in projects sponsored by research groups, NGOs, and policy institutions all over the world.

This year our students are criss-crossing the globe to work on AI governance in Brazil, transportation systems in Ghana, sustainable agriculture in Mongolia, and much more. Keep reading to learn more about each project.

 

We are working with the National Taiwan Ocean University and the Taiwan Law and Technology Association led by Dr. Yachi Chiang (江雅綺) to help strengthen the security and integrity of Taiwan’s undersea cables. Specifically, our focus is on cable resiliency against PRC aggression, given that
Ford Dorsey Master's in International Policy students Dwight Knightly, Hamzah Daud, Tabatha Anderson, and Francesca Verville.
Dwight Knightly, Hamzah Daud, Francesca Verville, and Tabatha Anderson

the Taiwanese cables to the Matsu Islands have been cut 27 times, most recently in spring 2023. Our final report and presentation will analyze Taiwan’s current emergency management and resiliency plans, identify areas of improvement, and present solutions to fix these gaps. All of us care deeply about democracy and the rule of law, and the security of Taiwan against PRC aggression is central in the fight for those ideals. Our hope is that this work helps in some small way to improve the security of Taiwan and its people.

 

Combating Online Harms in Young Professionals in New Zealand

Our team is working with Netsafe, an online safety charity, to address online harms faced by 18-30-year-olds of Chinese descent in New Zealand. Netsafe works alongside government and law enforcement to address online safety. Due to a lack of continuity of online safety educational programs, young professionals
Ford Dorsey Master's in International Policy students Sebastian Ogando, Raul Ruiz-Solis, Chase Lee, and Aya Purwandaya (not pictured).
Sebastian Ogando, Raul Ruiz-Solis, Chase Lee, and Aya Purwandaya (not pictured)

need resources to be aware of online risks and the best measures to protect themselves. Netsafe has yet to find the most effective way to appeal to this demographic group.

We aim to understand the demographic's most frequently used online platforms, the most common types of online harms, cultural factors, and relevant stakeholders.

 

Understanding Commercial Influence Operations on Social Media from China

Our MIP capstone team is working with DoubleThink Lab in Taiwan to map the ecosystem of People's Republic of China (PRC)-backed commercial influence operations on social media. Currently so-called "dark PR" firms can support PRC
Ford Dorsey Master's in International Policy students Nickson Quak, Gaute Friis, Sara Shah, and Elliot Stewart.
Nickson Quak, Gaute Friis, Sara Shah, and Elliot Stewart

disinformation operations with near impunity. We’re particularly interested in how the development of new tools and tactics – like commercial firms’ use of paid influencers, or generative AI – will aid in further obscuring attribution and scaling operations. Our policy recommendations will address how governments, international organizations, and platforms can tackle this issue.

 

Our team is working with the Institute for Technology and Society of Rio de Janeiro (ITS) and the Public Defender's Office (PDO-RJ) in the State of Rio de Janeiro to develop a common governance mechanism for the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI)
Ford Dorsey Master's in International Policy students Poramin Insom, Justin Yates, Thay Graciano, and Rosie Lebel.
Poramin Insom, Justin Yates, Thay Graciano, and Rosie Lebel

tools. Our research focuses on how the different state PDOs in Brazil can collaborate and share AI tools to help reduce their demand and better serve their clients. The goal is for AI to be a "shared public infrastructure" that multiple PDOs can use to serve their clients.

 

Creating Accessible, Affordable Transport Systems in Ghana

Our team is working with the Ghana Center for Democratic Development to understand opportunities for commute time relief in Accra's congested traffic. Our current challenge is identifying sources of improvement in the transit system and
Ford Dorsey Master's in International Policy students Skylar Coleman, Rosie Ith, and Maya Rosales.
Skylar Coleman, Rosie Ith, and Maya Rosales

integrating solutions available at scale for the public. We aim to recommend policy interventions which reflect local demand, ensuring sustainable, efficient, and accessible transportation solutions for the community.

 

Overgrazing and Climate Change in Mongolia

Our capstone focuses on overgrazing in Mongolia where disruptions to the traditional practices of nomadic tribes threaten grassland health. Disruptions include the free market incentivizing increasing herd sizes and climate change reducing the quantity and diversity of vegetation. In the absence of strong
Ford Dorsey Master's in International Policy students Ashwini Thakare, Olivia Hampsher-Monk, Kelsey Freeman, and Sarah Brakebill-Hacke.
Ashwini Thakare, Olivia Hampsher-Monk, Kelsey Freeman, and Sarah Brakebill-Hacke

government interventions, local control of stock numbers, or strong market incentives, herds exceed the grassland carrying capacity in pockets that are becoming increasingly degraded. This threatens nomadic pastoralism, a traditional way of life. With such complex and interlinked drivers to this problem, it has been challenging to isolate the causes we should focus on. We have been working with our partners at The Asia Foundation who are in the early stages of piloting a solution.

 

Solar Mini-grids and Renewable Energy in Sierra Leone

We’re partnering with Sustainable Energy for All, who have identified solar mini-grids as a necessary tool to achieve greater energy access in Sierra Leone. Previous efforts to improve the market for mini-grids have focused on regulatory reform and financial backing from diverse donors. Unfortunately,
Ford Dorsey Master's in International Policy students Felipe Galvis-Delgado, Javier Cantu, Pamella Ahairwe, and Ibilola Owoyele.
Felipe Galvis-Delgado, Javier Cantu, Pamella Ahairwe, and Ibilola Owoyele

these interventions have not led to a widespread growth in mini-grid development, as the industry continues to struggle. We hope to further explore the market and regulatory landscape and learn how sub-interventions including cross-subsidization, de-risking investment, demand creation, and other innovative and locally-based solutions may help improve the industry’s viability and aid in increasing access to affordable, renewable energy in Sierra Leone.

 

The Ford Dorsey Master's in International Policy

Want to learn more? MIP holds admission events throughout the year, including graduate fairs and webinars, where you can meet our staff and ask questions about the program.

Read More

The Ford Dorsey Master's in International Policy Class of 2025 at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies.
Blogs

Meet the Ford Dorsey Master's in International Policy Class of 2025

From tackling challenges caused by climate change to honing leadership skills for the armed services, the Class of 2025 has arrived at Stanford and is ready to get to work.
Meet the Ford Dorsey Master's in International Policy Class of 2025
Raul Ruiz at Duco Internship
Blogs

Thinking Like a CEO: Navigating San Francisco's Start-Up and Technology Landscape

Interning at Duco Experts, Raúl Ruiz-Solís (Master's in International Policy '24) gained an understanding of the start-up ecosystem in San Francisco, as well as some of the most pressing areas of opportunity in the field of cybersecurity and emerging technologies.
Thinking Like a CEO: Navigating San Francisco's Start-Up and Technology Landscape
The Ford Dorsey Master's in International Policy Class of 2024 at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies.
Blogs

Meet the Ford Dorsey Master's in International Policy Class of 2024

The 2024 class of the Ford Dorsey Master’s in International Policy has arrived at Stanford eager to learn from our scholars and tackle policy challenges ranging from food security to cryptocurrency privacy.
Meet the Ford Dorsey Master's in International Policy Class of 2024
All News button
1
Subtitle

Taiwan, New Zealand, and Sierra Leone are just a few of the places students from the Ford Dorsey Master's in International Policy are headed this year for their capstone projects.

Paragraphs

White nationalism remains an often overlooked terror threat amongst the many national security risks facing the United States and Russian Federation. While typically grounded in domestic theaters, white nationalist groups have increased the frequency and scale of their armed activities by incorporating aspects of transnational cooperation that are tactics often used by larger terrorist networks. This trend has raised questions regarding the ways in which white nationalism represents a new type of international technology-enabled terror threat toward the United States and Russian Federation and how policy makers can best address this challenge. This research paper will explore how white nationalist groups in the United States and Russian Federation have sought cooperation with one another through wider ideological and strategic alignment. This paper will also explore the respective communication techniques of these groups, which have been enabled through the internet and new technologies. This paper will conclude with a reflection on potential avenues of cooperation between the United States and the Russian Federation, drawing on previous examples of collaboration among government officials and non-state actors in combating terrorism.

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Conference Memos
Publication Date
Journal Publisher
The Stanford US-Russia Journal
Authors
Justin Tomczyk
Ilya Tolmachev
Lee DuWors
Number
No. 1
-
Claire Adida

Perspective-getting and correcting misconceptions are common interventions to promote inclusion toward outgroups. However, each strategy has limitations. Information corrections yield ambiguous effects, and empathy-based interventions may reproduce the biases they are meant to alleviate. We develop a theoretical framework that clarifies the strengths and weaknesses of each strategy, and offer a design to identify the conditions under which they are most effective. Using three studies on refugee inclusion with nearly 15,000 Americans over three years, we find that information and perspective-getting affect different outcomes. Perspective-getting affects warmth, policy preferences, and behavior, while information leads to factual updating only. We show that combining both interventions produces an additive effect on all outcomes, that neither strategy enhances the other, but that bundling the strategies may prevent backfire effects of information. Our results underscore the promise and limits of information and perspective-getting for promoting inclusion, highlighting the benefits of integrating the two strategies.

ABOUT THE SPEAKER

Claire Adida is Professor of Political Science and Director of the Center for Comparative Immigration Studies at UC San Diego. She is also a faculty affiliate with the UCSD Policy Design and Evaluation Lab, the UCSD Future of Democracy Initiative, the Stanford Immigration Policy Lab, the Evidence in Governance and Politics Groups, and the Center for Effective Global Action (CEGA). Professor Adida uses quantitative methods to study how countries manage new and existing forms of diversity. Her work has appeared in the American Political Science Review, the Quarterly Journal of Political Science, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Comparative Political Studies, the Journal of Experimental Political Science, Public Opinion Quarterly, PLoS ONE, and several other very prestigious outlets. She has written two books on immigrant exclusion, her 2010 Cambridge University Press book on Immigrant Exclusion and Insecurity in Africa and her 2016 Harvard University Press co-authored book on Why Muslim Integration Fails in Christian-Heritage Societies. Professor Adida’s work has been funded by the National Science Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Hellman Foundation, and the Evidence in Governance and Politics Group. Professor Adida serves on the editorial board of the American Political Science Review and is an Associate Editor at the Journal of Experimental Political Science. She received her PhD in political science from Stanford University in 2010.

William J. Perry Conference Room (Encina Hall, 2nd floor, 616 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford)

Open to Stanford-affiliates only

Claire Adida
Authors
Melissa Morgan
News Type
Commentary
Date
Paragraphs

If you had five minutes to speak with the president of the United States, what would you say? That’s the question Michael McFaul, director of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, posed to FSI scholars at a Stanford 2023 Reunion Homecoming event.

The discussion, “Global Threats Today: What's At Stake and What We Can Do About It,” centered around five major challenges currently facing the world: political dissatisfaction and disillusionment at home, tensions between China and Taiwan, the consequences of climate change, the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, and the conflict between Hamas and Israel.

Speaking to each of these areas of concern and how they overlap, FSI scholars Didi Kuo, Larry Diamond, Marshall Burke, Michael McFaul, and Amichai Magen offered their perspectives on what can be done. You can listen to their full conversation on the World Class podcast and browse highlights from their policy ideas below.

Follow the link for a full transcript of "Global Threats: What's at Stake and What We Can Do About It."


Reform the Electoral College |  Didi Kuo


One of the major problems people feel right now in American politics is that their voices aren’t heard. We live in what my colleague Francis Fukuyama calls a "vetocracy," meaning there are a lot of veto points in our system.

In a lot of other democratic institutional configurations, you have rule by the majority. But in the United States, we have an institutional configuration that allows a very small group — for example, 15 people in the House of Representatives — to hold up government in various ways. We see this in dramatic examples on the national level, but it also trickles down to the local level where you see it in issues like permitting hold-ups.

Reforming the Electoral College would be a very direct way of changing that vetocracy. The United States is one of the only advanced democracies that has this indirect system of elections. If all the votes counted equally and all the presidential candidates had to treat all of us the same and respond to us equally in all 50 states, it would do a lot to show the power of the popular vote and realign us more closely to the principle of majoritarianism that we should seek in our institutions.

Didi Kuo

Didi Kuo

Center Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute
Full Profile


Allow Taiwan to License Weapons Production |  Larry Diamond


My recommendation is deterrence, deterrence, deterrence. It is not inevitable that the People's Republic of China is going to launch an all-out military assault on Taiwan. But if the United States does not do more to make that a costly decision, the likelihood it will happen are exponentially higher.

Deterrence works. The United States deterred the Soviet Union from moving against West Berlin and much of Europe for decades. But it only works if you have a superior force.

To that end, the United States needs to pre-position more military force in the region. There's now a $12 billion backlog of weapons that Taiwan has ordered and paid for but hasn't received yet. That’s because the American defense production system is completely broken. This is the same reason why we can’t get weapons to Ukraine at the pace we need there.

This issue could be fixed, at least in part, if we licensed the production of some of these weapon systems directly to Taiwan. Their ability to build plants and produce these systems is much more agile than our own, and so licensing the rights to production would dramatically increase the deterrence factor against China, in addition to deepening our cooperation with allies throughout the region.

Portrait of Hesham Sallam

Larry Diamond

Mosbacher Senior Fellow in Global Democracy at FSI
Full Profile


Pursue Climate Mitigation AND Adaptation |  Marshall Burke


There are three things we can do in response to climate change: we can mitigate, we can adapt, or we can suffer. We’re off to a good start, but we have decades of long slog ahead of us to get that right. And it's not just us; even if we do a good job, we depend on other countries to also do a good job. The Biden administration has already been engaged on some of that front, but there’s more work to do there.

And even with our best efforts, we are not going to be able to move as fast as we want or mitigate our greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as we need to avoid climate change. So, we're going to have to live with some climate change, which means adaptation. And if we can't adapt, then we're going to suffer. 

The key point is that we are very poorly adapted to today's climate, much less the climate we're going to have 30 or 50 years from now. The West Coast and California are prime examples of this. There have been monumental wildfire seasons there the last few years, and there are significant negative health impacts from smoke exposure. I see it in my own home, even as someone who studies this and should know better and do more to reduce those risks.

The point is, we're really poorly adapted to the current climate, and things are going to get a lot worse. We need to focus on mitigation; it’s still really important and we need to get it done. But at the same time, we need to figure out how to adapt and live with the changing climate that we're going to experience.

Marshall Burke

Marshall Burke

Deputy Director of the Center on Food Security and the Environment
Full Profile


Weapons for Ukraine, Sanctions on Russia |  Michael McFaul


When I was in Kyiv this September, I had a chance to meet with President Zelenskyy, and he pointed out an absolutely crazy reality. Companies in the United States and Europe are still making tens of thousands of dollars in profits from selling various technologies that ultimately end up in Russia. It’s getting in through places like Hong Kong and Kazakhstan and Belarus and Georgia, and it allows Russia to keep waging its horrific war.

At the same time, the United States is spending millions of dollars to arm Ukraine with systems to shoot down the Russian rockets that were built using the components they got from the West. That’s completely illogical, bad policy. I know it’s hard to control technology, but we have to find a better way than what we’re doing right now. If you're an American taxpayer, that is your money being wasted.

That means more and better weapons for Ukraine, faster. And that means more and better sanctions on Russia, faster. That is the way to speed the end of this war.

Michael McFaul

Michael McFaul

Director of the Freeman Spogli Institute
Full Profile


Be Confident in America |  Amichai Magen


Just a few short years ago, we were all talking about the decline of the United States. I think that is far from inevitable. People speak about the 20th century as the “American Century.” The 21st century can also be the American Century. It's in our hands.

Be bullish on America. Be confident in America. Rediscover the spirit of America for adaptation and innovation and entrepreneurship. We need to wake up from the break we’ve taken from history in the post-Cold War era and rally once again in our spirit, our research, and our intellect.

We need to find new solution structures to the great challenges of our era: environmental challenges, AI, biotechnological challenges, nuclear challenges. And we can do it. China is on the verge of demographic decline and economic decline. Russia is a very dangerous international actor, but it is not a global superpower. We must reinvent the institutions and the alliances that we need for the 21st century in order to make sure that we continue a journey towards greater peace and prosperity for all of mankind.

Amichai Magen

Amichai Magen

Visiting Fellow in Israel Studies at the Freeman Spogli Institute
Full Profile


The entire discussion, including the audience Q&A, is available to watch on FSI's YouTube channel. To stay up to date on our content, be sure to like, subscribe, and turn on notifications.

Read More

Family and friends of May Naim, 24, who was murdered by Palestinians militants at the "Supernova" festival, near the Israeli border with Gaza strip, react during her funeral on October 11, 2023 in Gan Haim, Israel. (Getty Images)
News

FSI Scholars Analyze Implications of Hamas’ Terror Attack on Israel

Larry Diamond moderated a discussion between Ori Rabinowitz, Amichai Magen and Abbas Milani on the effects of Hamas’ attacks on Israel and what the emerging conflict means for Israel and Middle Eastern geopolitics.
FSI Scholars Analyze Implications of Hamas’ Terror Attack on Israel
Michael McFaul poses with a Stanford University flag in front of a group of Ukrainian alumni during a reunion dinner in Kyiv.
Blogs

On the Ground in Ukraine: A Report from Michael McFaul and Francis Fukuyama

A trip to Kyiv gave FSI Director Michael McFaul and Olivier Nomellini Senior Fellow Francis Fukuyama the opportunity to meet with policymakers, military experts, and Ukrainian alumni of FSI's programs and fellowships.
On the Ground in Ukraine: A Report from Michael McFaul and Francis Fukuyama
Democracy Day 2023 light up marquee letters
News

Democracy Day sweeps Stanford

Thousands turned out for the student-run, campuswide event, which has grown significantly since launching in 2021.
Democracy Day sweeps Stanford
All News button
1
Subtitle

FSI scholars offer their thoughts on what can be done to address political polarization in the United States, tensions between Taiwan and China, climate change, the war in Ukraine, and the Israel-Hamas war.

-
Public Opinion in Palestine Before the Conflict

On the eve of Hamas’s October 7 attacks on Israel, Arab Barometer completed its 8th wave survey in Palestine. The findings offer unique insight into the views of ordinary Palestinians living in both the West Bank and Gaza.

In this event, guest speakers Amaney A. Jamal and Michael Robbins will provide an overview of the views of government, living conditions, views of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and international actors. This includes low levels of support for most existing political actors and increasingly difficult economic situations for Palestinians. Jamal and Robbins find that Palestinians want a peaceful solution and are wary of normalization that does not provide a solution to this broader problem. They find limited support for most international actors, but do find indications of which countries may be better placed to help bring an end to the conflict and work to rebuild Gaza once the conflict comes to an end.

ABOUT THE SPEAKERS

Amaney Jamal

Amaney A. Jamal is Dean of the Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, the Edwards S. Sanford Professor of Politics, and Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University. Jamal also directs the Workshop on Arab Political Development and the Bobst-AUB Collaborative Initiative. She is the former President of the Association of Middle East Women’s Studies (AMEWS). The focus of her current research is on the drivers of political behavior in the Arab world, Muslim immigration to the US and Europe, and the effect of inequality and poverty on political outcomes. Jamal’s books include Barriers to Democracy (2007), which explores the role of civic associations in promoting democratic effects in the Arab world (winner of the 2008 APSA Best Book Award in comparative democratization). She is co-editor of Race and Arab Americans Before and After 9/11: From Invisible Citizens to Visible Subjects (2007) and Citizenship and Crisis: Arab Detroit after 9/11 (2009). Her most recent book, Of Empires and Citizens, was published by Princeton University Press (2012). Jamal is co-principal investigator of the Arab Barometer Project, winner of the Best Dataset in the Field of Comparative Politics (Lijphart/Przeworski/Verba Dataset Award 2010); co-PI of the Detroit Arab American Study, a sister survey to the Detroit Area Study; and senior advisor on the Pew Research Center projects focusing on Islam in America (2006) Global Islam (2010) and Islam in America (2017). Ph.D. University of Michigan. In 2005, Jamal was named a Carnegie Scholar.
 

Michael Robbins

Michael Robbins is the director and co-principal investigator of Arab Barometer. He has been a part of the research network since its inception and serving as director since 2014. He has led or overseen more than 100 surveys in international contexts and is a leading expert in survey methods on ensuring data quality. His work on Arab public opinion, political Islam, and political parties has been published in Comparative Political Studies, the Journal of Conflict Resolution, the Journal of Democracy and Foreign Affairs. He received the American Political Science Association Aaron Wildavsky Award for the Best Dissertation in the field of Religion and Politics.

Hesham Sallam

Online via Zoom

Amaney Jamal Professor Professor of Politics and International Affairs Princeton School for Public and International Affairs
Michael Robbins Director and Co-Principal Investigator Director and Co-Principal Investigator, Arab Barometer Arab Barometer
Lectures
Paragraphs

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1970 requires federal agencies to assess the environmental impact of proposed federal actions. NEPA thus affects delivery of a wide range of infrastructure projects. NEPA requires the completion of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for environmentally impactful federal actions. For infrastructure projects this can entail significant delays. A typical EIS now takes about four and one-half years and is over 600 pages long. Some EIS’s take over a decade to complete. We provide the first detailed analysis of project approval times under NEPA by examining 1269 EIS permitting processes. We analyze empirically the well-defined interval from Notice of Intent to file to Record of Decision (ROD). We use a Cox proportional hazard model to estimate the impact of several factors on EIS duration. Factors include permits featuring major construction, those including private investment, those for projects located in states with restrictive environmental laws, those using the federal permitting “dashboard,” and those publishing a Supplemental EIS prior to the ROD. We find that privately financed projects receive faster permitting, while projects involving major construction, those undertaken in restrictive states, and those utilizing the federal permitting dashboard, face slower permitting times. We also explore links between EIS page counts and permitting time. Greater EIS page counts are associated with longer permitting times. We conclude by examining EIS completion during economic stimulus programs such as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), as well as the frequency of EIS completion by the federal government.

All Publications button
1
Publication Type
Journal Articles
Publication Date
Journal Publisher
Journal of Regulatory Economics
Authors
Michael Bennon
Daniel De La Hormaza
R. Richard Geddes
-
NEPA Litigation Over Large Energy and Transport Infrastructure Projects with Michael Bennon

Despite five decades of experience, there is a considerable gap in legal and empirical study on the impacts of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Proponents of reform often claim NEPA litigation is a major obstacle for federal actions; others have concluded that litigation is not a major contributor of project cost escalation or delays. This webinar reviews the NEPA process and a recent study of the incidence and conditions of infrastructure project litigation under NEPA, using a data set of 355 major transportation and energy infrastructure projects that completed a federal environmental study between 2010 and 2018. Energy sectors with greater private financing have shorter permit durations and higher rates of litigation and cancellation, but also higher completion rates relative to transport sectors, which have greater public financing and lower litigation rates but longer permit timelines.

DATE: September 29, 2023
TIME: 12:00 – 1:00 PM (eastern time) / 9:00 - 10:00 am (pacific time)
PRESENTER: Michael Bennon, Stanford University

This event is co-sponsored by the Build America Center and the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law.

Online via Zoom.

Encina Hall
616 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford, CA 94305-6055

0
Research Scholar
mike_bennon_2022.jpg

Michael Bennon is a Research Scholar at CDDRL for the Global Infrastructure Policy Research Initiative. Michael's research interests include infrastructure policy, project finance, public-private partnerships and institutional design in the infrastructure sector. Michael also teaches Global Project Finance to graduate students at Stanford. Prior to Stanford, Michael served as a Captain in the US Army and US Army Corps of Engineers for five years, leading Engineer units, managing projects, and planning for infrastructure development in the United States, Iraq, Afghanistan and Thailand. 

Program Manager, Global Infrastructure Policy Research Initiative
Michael Bennon
Seminars
Subscribe to Policy Analysis