Accommodating Religious Objections to Vaccination Mandates—Implications of Groff v DeJoy for Health Care Employers
Accommodating Religious Objections to Vaccination Mandates—Implications of Groff v DeJoy for Health Care Employers
During the COVID-19 pandemic, courts have limited the federal government’s ability to impose vaccination mandates; some judges have also questioned whether states must grant religious exemptions to vaccination mandates. The Supreme Court’s June 2023 decision in Groff v DeJoy2 concerning Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 raises new questions about the ability of private employers—including health care organizations—to enforce vaccination requirements for employees who have religious objections.