Policy Brief: The Complexities of Race Adjustment in Health Algorithms

Policy Brief: The Complexities of Race Adjustment in Health Algorithms

As policymakers, health-care practitioners, and technologists pursue the application of AI and machine learning (ML) algorithms in health care, this policy brief underscores the need for health equity research and highlights the limitations of employing technical “fixes” to address deep-seated health inequities.

 

HAI-SHP Policy Brief: Complexities of Race Adjustment in Health Algorithms

 

Chronic kidney disease affects more than one in seven adults—or about 37 million people—in the United States. For racial and ethnic minorities, the burden of kidney failure is higher: Black or African American and Hispanic patients are at least 3-fold and 1.5-fold more likely to progress to kidney failure in comparison to non-Hispanic white patients, in part due to delays in referrals and visits to nephrology. Despite recognition of these disparities in the 1980s, there has been little to no improvement since then.

There are debates about how to account for race in algorithms that are widely used to gauge the severity of kidney disease and inform related care decisions. For a long time, race was considered a factor when assessing kidney disease severity. Two of the most widely adopted kidney-disease-related equations incorporated a Black or non-Black race variable. Because the use of race variables in clinical algorithms propagates racial bias in decision-making, two professional organizations helped develop a different clinical algorithm that does not incorporate race in 2021. 

HAI-SHP policy brief bios

Our paper, “Algorithmic Changes Are Not Enough: Evaluating the Removal of Race Adjustment from the eGFR Equation,” is the first to assess the 2021 equation’s effect on care decision-making for chronic kidney disease patients, including its impact on care disparities for racial and ethnic minorities. Our study estimates the effects of implementing the kidney disease equation without race adjustment on nephrology referrals and visits for patients within the Stanford Health Care system.

While our study focuses on a single medical center and a single disease, the findings present important considerations for the healthcare field. As policymakers, healthcare practitioners, and technologists alike pursue the application of AI and machine learning (ML) algorithms in healthcare, our research underscores the need for health equity research and highlights the limitations of employing technical “fixes” to address deep-seated health inequities.

Read the Full Policy Brief

Image
Complexities of Race Adjustment in Health Algorithms-Photo2

 

Read More

Getty Images Illustration kidneys
News

Removing Race Adjustment in Chronic Kidney Disease Care

A new study led by Stanford Health Policy researchers finds that algorithmic changes to a chronic kidney disease care equation are likely insufficient to achieve health equity as many other structural inequities remain.
cover link Removing Race Adjustment in Chronic Kidney Disease Care
Getty Images Illustration of AI in Health Care
Commentary

Using Artificial Intelligence Tools and Health Insurance Coverage Decisions

It would seem like AI would be a logical tool to help evaluate insurance coverage and claims. But results so far have been sobering, leading to class-action lawsuits and congressional committees demanding answers.
cover link Using Artificial Intelligence Tools and Health Insurance Coverage Decisions
Michelle Mello testifies before U.S. Senate Committee on Finance
News

Michelle Mello Testifies Before U.S. Senate on AI in Health Care

In her testimony before the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, Mello emphasized the need for federal guardrails and standards regarding the use of artificial intelligence in health care.
cover link Michelle Mello Testifies Before U.S. Senate on AI in Health Care